SULEMAN versus MST. ZEENAT JAN
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) declares a transaction relating to the sale of the plaintiff to the owner of the suit and the sale of the sale in favor of the defendants in that case. Suit for The matter was not implemented as it was not paid, so the relevant changes were bound to be canceled, Syed suit was completely dismissed by the High Court, the appeal of the appeal was upheld by the Supreme Court. Which was not allowed in this case. Has been completely dismissed by the High Court because the burden of proof in relation to the payment of the sale was on the defendants, who positively claimed that they paid after the plaintiff's refusal and presented it by the parties. The evidence was not properly assessed by the first appellate court and the High Court, and the mutation was not approved and the matter for sale was left to the plaintiff. Was not considered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Kamalia lawyer