Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PROVINCE OF SINDH versus GUL MUHAMMAD HAJANO


Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1993 Constitutional Jurisdiction Applying High Court Scenario Applied to Chief Minister, Implementation of Synopsis for Salary Protection and Salary Deployment The summary submitted by the officials was that the matter was related to the terms and conditions of service, therefore, a constitutional petition filed by civil servants was allowed on the basis that no government order was sought. The duty was to request the duty and to perform orders within a reasonable time. The judicial decision passed by the High Court was based on a valid and legal basis and was in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court, no wrong reading, no reading material and the facts and facts of the case before the High Court. There was no comprehension nor any question of the common people. The leave to appeal was denied as the case was involved.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Bunner lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.