Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus INAYAT RASOOL

Key 18:06:05 Pakistan International Airlines for Essential Utility Service (MLR 52), para 5 law in evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 21 Service Tribunals Act (1973) LXX), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the MLR No. 52 dismissed by the Employment Review Board by order dated 14-14 1990 Without the benefit of its former service authority, the date is numbered 31 7 1995. Respondents' pre-service voluntary Golden Handshake Scheme for Pension Benefit Pension Acquisition, under PIAC Personal Policies for the benefit of service offered before and at the end of this period Is. He remained out of service on the recommendation of the Review Board Authority dated 31st 1995, who accepted this option without giving the benefit of the service offered before the job, with the benefit of the previous service restoring the service. Deprived of the right, he approached the authority for injustice, but the failed service tribunal accepted the defendant's appeal, the Review Review Board recommending the defendant's re-employment in favor of previous service benefits. The Pension Benefit and the Sanitary Review Board used the word 're-employment' for rehabilitation and in practice it was recommended for rehabilitation in the service without financing. Corporation v. Malik Khalid Hussain and others (CRP No. 7K of 2001) could not withdraw from their actions and could not change their position contrary to the position presented before the Supreme Court. Admission to this price law firms from Barkhan lawyer