Find a Lawyer

SAMIULLAH KHAN MARWAT versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Rules of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 3 (a) (b) (d), 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) denial of services against civil servants by the Service Tribunal in the light of the inquiry officer's inquiry and the Prime Minister's Inspection Commission's inquiry if the inquiry officer brought a tire-based inquiry. After the employee issued the final showcase notice to the civil, the competent authority was found guilty of such charges. Servants and considering the matter, they have been dismissed from the job. The department officials also considered the report of the Prime Minister's Inspection Commission, which was not brought on record in the purchase. Neither the official version of the Inquiry Officer nor the Government employee were kept in the Inquiry, such a report of the Prime Minister's Inspection Commission was made against the Government Employee for purposes of investigation under the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973. It cannot be understood that such a report was not appropriate for reference by the service tribunal in making a wrong decision and the findings of a legal inquiry officer are incomprehensible or unreadable to the public servant while the citizens in charge of the department CCP and DIG police. Is considered to be a protector of the rights of and was in legal form. Instead of protecting their subordinates guaranteed under the constitution, instead of protecting their rights and freedoms, they were also charged with not allowing criminal law to be used against innocent people and insulting the authority of public workers. Neither will I be allowed any exemption in the legal proceedings of their subordinates. registration advocate from Diamer lawyer