ZAFAR IQBAL ALIAS AZHAR versus THE STATE
Evidence was not appreciated by the general public in the Proceedings of the Illegal Arms Act, 1991, Section 7 (c) recovery, although public witnesses were available at the relevant time, whose private name was in the recovery memo. Was mentioned. Since a witness was not a resident of the area and did not support the prosecution case, instead he appeared as a defense witness. The recovered pistol was never sealed and was not parceled there. Nor was any weapon specialist ever sent. To prove that the pistol was in working condition, the recovered pistol was not loaded nor any bullet was recovered. There was nothing available to record that showed that the pistol was suspected prior to the target's date. Was in charge of the collection that was assigned to collect. In reference to the Illegal Arms Act 1991, the circumstances were not attracted and the sanctioned sentence against the accused was set aside by the High Court and the accused was a cquitted charge.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Shikarpur lawyer
