Find a Lawyer

HAIDER SHAH versus ZAR BADSHAH

Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XVII, R 3: Sections 96 and 115 delayed appeal pending dismissal, petitioner's defense O XVII, R 3, dismissed under CPC Had gone and appealed against the order. The reason for the delay by the applicant was that he had gone to the truth of the preaching, the delay gives the other party a valuable right and in order to deprive the other party of such right, there must be a lot of conviction. Is. And no reason was offered by the applicant after the overdue period, which was precisely the reason why the applicant's statement that he / she was preaching at the relevant time. had gone. As a result of which he was barred from filing the appeal from time to time, without any persuasive attempt by himself, there was no result. The High Court refused to interfere with the decisions and decisions of the two courts. The following review was rejected in circumstances: female advocates from Rahimyar Khan lawyer