Find a Lawyer

KHANZADA versus BAHADUR

Under the Code of Civil Code 1908 Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal, respectively, adjourned the appeal filed by the plaintiff with the fact of fact by the courts below the CPC scope decree suit. Failed to identify ant. It is harmful to read plaintiffs 'interests or to read evidence that it is not harmful for plaintiffs' interest to read false statements and evidence without any positive effort by the plaintiffs following the decisions and orders passed by the courts below. The result was. The matter was not dealt with diligently and, in view of the failure of the plaintiff to prove his claim, his case was dismissed for valid reasons which was maintained in the appeal which was followed by the following two courts. Could not maintain the facts related to the reality of the matter. The High Court is upset at the exercise of the jurisdiction of the amendment under Section 115, CPC, unless the two Republic Councils were constituted, the following arts had misrepresented the evidence while searching for facts. Either the material piece of evidence on record was disregarded or there was a perverse High Court to use the facts recorded by both courts in its jurisdiction under section 115, the CPC could only intervene. Based on the orders of the subordinate courts, the court below assumed its jurisdiction which is not restricted to it or it failed to exercise the jurisdiction exercised by the law or the court below To influence its jurisdiction lawer from fb area from Kurram lawyer