SABAZ ALI KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199, 187 (2) and 190 Constitutional Appeal A Company Applicants Implementation of Order of the Supreme Court Management Trainee Scheme was not absorbed in regular services after completing the training of the Supreme Court while the High Court filed against the judgment. The appeal was denied. The court rejected the applicant's constitutional request and observed that the company had decided to add a new trainee in this case, the applicant would be free to apply for the position and the company would pay full attention to the fact that He successfully completed a training company and then applied for positions. Applicants were considered several times but not every time. The court of correctness directed the applicants to consider only the issue at the time of appointment, which showed that the respondents' chart on record showed that the applicants had obtained 47% to 67% marks and serial numbers. There was a similar chart about the position maintained in the merit list in 20, in which serial numbers 2, 3, 4 and 13 were assigned to the four former trains to be placed in the merit list. The court's directive was not violated because the petitioner hid the material facts from the High Court because the temple of the constitutional petition Was not disclosed in Jatts. Nevertheless, he appeared in the written examination and interview and did not succeed in the merit list in Serial No 20 and could not attain his status, so the applicant did not approach the High Court. Work at the discretion of the applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Issa Khel lawyer