Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus SARFRAZ ALI

CPC Adjustments Civil Procedure Code Order XVIIA XVII, R 3 Closing of the plaintiff's evidence On the date set by the plaintiff to record evidence that the plaintiff's evidence was not available, the case was adjourned at the request of the plaintiff's lawyer for his evidence. Gone, there were only lawyers for the parties on the date of hearing adjourned, Plaintiff's lawyer argued that the plaintiffs were present with the witnesses on the postponement date of the hearing when the evidence of the plaintiff was closed, after the plaintiff's request was postponed. Not removed from the record, the provisions of section XVII, R 3, CPC of the trial court in this case, in the circumstances, justified the plaintiff's evidence. R was closed and was rightly excluded as trial. famous lower court advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer