Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus SARFRAZ ALI


CPC Adjustments Civil Procedure Code Order XVIIA XVII, R 3 Closing of the plaintiff's evidence On the date set by the plaintiff to record evidence that the plaintiff's evidence was not available, the case was adjourned at the request of the plaintiff's lawyer for his evidence. Gone, there were only lawyers for the parties on the date of hearing adjourned, Plaintiff's lawyer argued that the plaintiffs were present with the witnesses on the postponement date of the hearing when the evidence of the plaintiff was closed, after the plaintiff's request was postponed. Not removed from the record, the provisions of section XVII, R 3, CPC of the trial court in this case, in the circumstances, justified the plaintiff's evidence. R was closed and was rightly excluded as trial.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.