Find a Lawyer

MASJID MAKTAB ANWAR-E-MADINA, FAISALABAD versus TOOR KHAN

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 suit for declaration claimed that the plaintiff claimed that he was the owner of the suit land under the Punjab Government notification / policy letter 222 1979 and he was entitled to the property rights, but instead he remained. The alleged reporting / policy letter threatens to intimidate the plaintiff, but he may claim that he may be entitled to the grant of proprietary rights, but this may result in the occupation of the land in the possession of the lessor resident Cannot create owner. The instructions, but could not give the plaintiff any rights for which it could be declared under section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, the trial court ruled only to the extent that the defendants were unlawfully The plaintiff was prevented from pursuing a settlement on and by law. The appellate court dismissed the case completely, claiming that the plaintiff was entitled to ownership because he was a resident of the Katchi population. According to the policy letter appellate court, the decision of the rights suit judge was not justified and the appellant. The order below was set aside by the court and the trial court's order and order was restored. best law firms from Bhuawana lawyer