Find a Lawyer

HAKAM DAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 10 and 30 Proprietary Rights of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, grant of applicants who had been claiming to own the state land for five years in their leasehold property, praying for the grant of proprietary rights in respect of such land. Was Almost the entire area was arid. Under the notification, there was a compulsory provision for the grant of proprietary rights; the applicant's lease expired, but after the ease of termination, the applicant did not apply for extension of the lease and the result it happened. The district collector's order was resumed and it was stated that the restoration order had been finalized, in the circumstances, there was no less than land in dispute when it applied for proprietary battles in favor of the applicant. Provided, in the circumstances, was not eligible or the property rights in dispute were reached by the courts concluding that the applicant was not entitled to grant the property of the applicants, and the rights of the attic should be based on reasoned and reasoned reasoning. Due to this, the High Court could not interfere with the use of this Amendment jurisdiction. Whereby any supply fails to identify any error of law by courts or commissions violated. The order of the courts below has been dismissed best law firm from Muridkay lawyer