Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASADULLAH SHAIKH versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Rules of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 5 (1) (iii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Dismissal of employment on the basis of allegations of misconduct and misconduct. Conduct of Inquiry by Government Employer after issuance of life and non-issuance of other showcase notices Impact Employee got leave for 56 days due to his heart disease, which was given to him, his 16 year old younger The son also suffered from B. thalassemia major and he was under treatment in Pakistan and the doctor treating him in Pakistan started his bone marrow transplant from abroad. Recommended government employee abroad arrange his son's treatment of his heart disease and return to Pakistan and apply for extension of his leave for a further 120 days on the bone marrow transplant of his sick son overseas. On and on, his leave was extended, according to which a civil servant left Pakistan and admitted his son. Unexpected departure of a government employee for treatment at a hospital abroad was abruptly canceled with immediate effect, and the competent authority informed the government employee in a letter that his request for extension; Pakistan's leave was rejected. And they were placed under suspension, so they were granted a show cause notice by the competent authority under special charges under the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973, after the authorized officer exercised his free mind. That there was no need for formal inquiry into the facts and circumstances of the case and the matter was subject to R5 (1) (iii), Rkary employees (capacity and Discipline) Rules in respect of 1973 registration advocate from Chilas lawyer