Find a Lawyer

COMMANDING OFFICER, FRONTIER WORKS ORGANIZATION,KARACHI versus HAJI ABDUL WAHEED

Balochistan Minor Concession Rules 2000, Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1993 Constitutional Scope of High Court Efficient and proper treatment, absence of dispute between parties, royalty on sand, gravel and stone crushing Was related to payment of. River Response to the Minor Coastal Road Construction of the Minor Coastal Road Construction of the Minor Coastal Road The Balochistan Minor Concession Contract was subject to the provisions of Rule 2000, but initially the applicant removed the material. Royalty was paid. Refusing to pay the amount on the basis that such a scheme was exempt from the payment of royalty, the respondent accepted the royalty non-payment act in the civil suit but the case was dismissed and the Constitution was dismissed. The petition was filed with constitutional jurisdiction in this regard. Let the application go on the basis that no department is exempt, the applicant paid such taxpayer that the constitutional application was not intact as the case requires recording of the evidence. It was up to the High Court to decide whether the applicant was responsible for paying tax royalties, nor was he required to record evidence, nor to dispute the fact that the dispute arose. The Court considered this matter from every angle rightly and according to the law, the decision passed by the High Court was not open to any exception as it was based on reasonableness and law. Nor was any material illegal or illegal to appeal famous lower court advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer