SYED NIAZ HUSSAIN SHAH BUKHARI, TECHNICIAN (PROCESS) versus OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED
Salary, after receiving a city order against the return of a public servant, he was allowed to continue his duties at the place where he was paid for a period of about three to three years; As paid He was absent from duty The Government Tribunal upheld the dismissal appeal of the public servants. The public servant did not pay his duties either at the original place or at the place where he was transferred. There was a period of withdrawal of salary from a public servant, for which he did not work when there was no work, there was no salary correctly recovered from the public servant because the uncontested decision was not open to the exception. There was no legal error or misunderstanding of the facts and the law. The public importance considered under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution was dismissed by the Supreme Court upon the expulsion of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Mohmand lawyer