UNION BANK LIMITED versus SILVER OIL MILLS LIMITED
Article 22 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Demanding Appeal for Regular Hearing Applying for leave to appeal Appeal to Financial Institutions (Finance Recovery) Section 22 of the Ordinance 2001 The appeal was not yet decided by the applicant bank that the demand was raised by the bank that the order was stopped and the appeal was filed at regular hearing without giving any proper reason. Preferred appeal from the borrower is pending judgment of rights and obligations. Make and thus all the priorities set forth in the application for leave to appeal can be upheld before the High Court where the matter is pending. No decision on the question of maintaining the appeal by the High Court, leave application for appeal is interim and Appeal against the trial hearing was filed prematurely for leave to leave on stage entertainment. Eail was not required even though the aggravated clash by the applicant bank was convinced and it needs to be taken seriously now. In such a case, the Supreme Court was not to interfere because the creditors' appeal Pending a decision on the merit of the question of maintaining the ayykurt and was yet to be decided was refused leave to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer