Find a Lawyer

ZAHID RASHID versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 Rr 2 (4) and 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Basic pay mismanagement for less than one year, reduced to a lesser term, criminal charge Acquittal Was charged with a civil servant. According to a press report, the prosecution failed to present any evidence against the civil servant during the criminal trial. As a result, he was acquitted of the charge, and also initiated a prosecution against the civil servant. The government employee was found guilty of the charges but without basic privileges and justification, a lower salary of 17 years in the base salary scale 17 was recommended. The service tribunal did not record the service tribunal reducing the fines to one year in the lower class. The reporter, the publisher or the editor of the newspaper did not investigate any finding of justification against the civil servant in the inquiry proceedings nor the effect of the abduction, abduction, etc. in the criminal case. As a result, the civil servant was honorably discharged in a criminal case in a judicial case in which the reporter, publisher, or newspaper editor was not inspected. All of this proceeding was initiated against the civil servants with a particular purpose for wrongful action which was set aside by the Government Tribunal decision passed by the service tribunal and the government employee has to pay all the previous salary scale 18. Was restored to original grade with benefits. lawer from fb area from Sagri lawyer