MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX)
The appellate tribunal of section 194B referred to the High Court's order, without the confirmation of the counsel for the scope of the order, the appellate tribunal on the basis of the applicant's effect, on the basis of a short order Excluded from the appeal was a mistake of law. On the day of his hearing, when his lawyer was not present, the record of his counsel's hearing was correct, on the day of the hearing, the appellate tribunal was told that appellant's lawyer was out of town, however, the appellate tribunal. Proceed for the next six months without having to record the reasons for the same decision, dismiss the eligibility appeal, and the aforesaid decision was re-presented to the applicant on the basis of the judgment appeal filed by the applicant. Some of the specific grounds filed were reproduced. Appeal was not heard / heard as the tribunal required by law fell into error when the High Court, while dismissing the petitioner's appeal, nominated the Appellate Tribunal and provided a meaningful hearing for the applicant's counsel. Without, the appellate tribunal reference is allowed in the case, circumstances r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
