Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus UNITED BANK LIMITED

The petition for leave to defend the defendants for the recovery of the provisions of section 10 and 19 was dismissed and the defendant was given a verdict, after which the implementing court decided to pay the dues in installments. Applied for by the implementing court. The plaintiff voluntarily accepted his legal status by declaring the payment of the unpaid amount in installments to the Banking Court Decree and the execution court accepted the defendant's plea, therefore the Banking Court The legality and validity of the disapproval decree was barred from questioning

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• TANVIR REHMAT MALIK v. REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2013 PLC(CS) 674
• SHANSHAH SHAMIL PARACHA v. EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE 2013 MLD 674
• Rao NAEEM SARFARAZ v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Chief Election Commissioner 2013 PLD 675
• Chaudhary UMAR AZIZ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2013 CLC 675
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. SENIOR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX) 2013 PTD 679
• FAHAD alias FAHDU v. State 2013 YLR 681
• KHALID ANWAR v. EX-OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE, LAHORE 2013 PCrLJ 684
• OLIVE GRILL RESTAURANT v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Home Department 2013 PLD 689

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes