Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus HAMEED AKHTAR NIAZI, ACADEMY OF ADMINISTRATIVE, TRAINING WALTON, LAHORE

The Civil Servants Act, 1973, is for development in the form of a Measurement Services Tribunal jurisdiction for selection selection posts for promotion of Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Promotion Selection Post and Non Selection Post. In the case of Selection of seniority is based on the decision of the competent authority for the promotion of high grades based on low fitness, no other forum / authority can assume the duties, which are specifically assigned to the competent authority, seniority is one of these factors. Yes, advertising is considered, but loneliness is not enough. Promotion does not happen automatically; it depends on many other factors, such as qualification, position and past availability, and none of the above factors. There is nothing less important than seniority, and the factors for promoting them all, on a case-by-case basis, are better sanity. On the basis, the benefits of the development will be considered, no selection grade, cannot be claimed, nor will the service tribunal in the appeal be entitled to grant it from the deadline, because of the requirements for promotion. Relevant requirements have not been examined by the competent authority at the relevant time, the development could not be called by the service tribunal as a right of development employee, and refusal or refusal to develop is a case in point. , Which is in the exclusive domain of the government / executive authority, cannot be done if a public servant is denied promotion. Denied a fundamental right tax advocates from Shangla lawyer