INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERSOFFICE, KARACHI versus SHAFQAT MEHMOOD
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) Deprivation of service The fact-finding inquiry committee, a government employee on the recommendation of failure to associate a probe with him, was charged with a criminal offense in which he was prosecuted by the complainant. And he was acquitted and a department was formed. The founding committee of the committee investigating the matter was not allowed to participate in the investigation of the public servant and on the basis of the report submitted by the committee, the civil servant was dismissed, the service tribunal filed an appeal by a public servant. And restored it. On the basis that after his acquittal, there was no material available for the authorities to prosecute and sentence, the decision by the Service Tribunal for validity was based on valid and valid reasons and it was for the Supreme Court. Was not according to the law nor was there. Neither the wrong reading, nor the reading of material evidence or the misinterpretation of facts and the law authorities failed to raise any question about the importance of the general public as contemplated under Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution. Refused to interfere with the decision passed by
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer