Find a Lawyer

KAPUR TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED versus BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED

Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Finance) Act 1997 Sections 12 and 9 (4) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) A. XXXVII, R2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) for rehabilitation. The summons was issued to the accused after the suit was filed under the suit law and later it was also published in the top newspapers but no record came out which had passed the order. There was no subsequent trial court, nor a petition for leave was filed to defend the case, and the banking court did not allow the banking companies (loans, Services, credit and financial recovery) Act, 1997 and section XXXVII and ruled that the suit provided under 9 (4). , R 2, CPC as evidenced in the affidavit at the time of the affidavit and claimed that the case was ordered because the order was set aside The plaintiff was not given the correct address of the defendant, therefore, the decree was not acted upon according to the law, the High Court, rejecting the restriction, dismissed the request that the defendant, in fact, be the defendant's Was presented as a case, and it has been stated that the courts below have not considered the matter in their original context. That the requests for rejection of the decree were timely and that the judgment of the High Court had resulted in a misunderstanding of justice and that the defendant had informed the plaintiff (bank) about the change of address. Shows that the defendant's proper service was adopted in the court case and that the defendant did not when you need a advocate from Turbat lawyer