JAMEELA KAUSAR versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 (3) Educational institution being unfair means conducting forfeiture proceedings and fraud in its SC examination by changing the pages of applicants / candidates in its response book. Was disqualified by the authorities of. The legal status of the order passed by the board was incorporated in the constitutional petition and the High Court passed the interim order in favor of the applicant, succeeding in securing admission to the Medical College on the basis of interim order. A division bench was formed to deal with the issues. After the approval of the record presented by the board officials regarding admission to medical colleges across the province to maintain consistency in the policy, the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the petition as the applicant had no facts or legal in the approved order. Could not show weakness. What the applicant's board authorities noted was that the disciplinary proceedings were initiated at a phased stage and were in the advanced stages of medical studies. This page was pasted into stapled sheets that were later covered in layers. Further, despite the inquiry, no purpose of malicious interference by any of the officials or officials of the Board was excluded, the Supreme Court refused to intervene in the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court because it There was uncertainty in which no path could enter. For this reason, the applicant's study phase will be allegedly deserted, not only because of one's own wrongdoing
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Kotla Pathan lawyer