Find a Lawyer

WAQAS AKRAM versus DR. MUHAMMAD TAHIRUL QADRI

Representation of the People's Act 1976 Section 99 (1) (b) Conduct of General Election Order, (7 of 2002) Article 8D (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 62 (b) National Assembly to determine the candidates. The date of election of the candidate for the age of was different from the one mentioned in the Matriculation Certificate of Birth Certificate and National Identity Card Matric Certificate which showed that the candidate was under 25 years of age at the time of submission of papers. But according to the birth certificate and National Identity Card, the candidate had reached the required age on the last day to submit the nomination papers, Returning Off Head of the candidate's nomination papers were filed because the collection was rejected the day when he was not in the candidate nomination papers. The appellate tribunal also retained 25 years on the basis of entries in the berth certificate and national ID card order passed by the Returning Officer. Also, the High Court's position on the contesting candidates / respondents was that the candidate acted in a very good manner and the date for giving birth to the same date through the treatment selection application available to him against his nomination papers. The challenge was to give in the Matriculation Certificate was not a trivial matter and if a candidate had done such a procedure, such a candidate could not be named dishonestly and the candidate would have been given a separate date in his Matric Certificate. Was and is in favor of challenging birth. In presenting the documents in support of his claim, the proper point of view in such a case was that the lawsuit on this subject became lawful. power of attorney advocate Kunjah lawyer