SIRAJ DIN versus GHULAM NABI
Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Section 17 (b) Declaration by a person in the interest of a woman, a permanent injunction and her possession claiming that her mother was a suitor Is the owner. That he had never appointed anyone to be his lawyer and that the Attorney General's Attorney was invalid and fraudulent and that the change in the suit property sale was not only illegal but also confirmed the change through this innovation. Which was not managed by Patwari at that time. Neither the General Power of Attorney's document nor the Notary Public's endorsement were examined to prove the fact that the very basis of the case was baseless and had to fall when the sale in dispute Changes were made, stability was pending, deviations and alterations, in the absence of a registered cell deed, and even without the necessary permission of the stabilization officer, there was an illegal record which shows that no such general power off The attorney was not presented in the evidence before the trial court as if it did not exist, its authenticity was never produced. The property that intends to generate interest in the right, title or immovable property must require registration. If the General Power of Attorney had existed, it must have been registered as such and the General Power off by Notary Public. The mere certification of an attorney was not enough to meet the requirements of the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Bajaur lawyer