HAJI SHAMAL versus THE STATE
Testimony of the Prevention of Smuggling Act 1977 Section 31 The federal government's witnesses investigated the confiscation of property in the name of the accused were all guilty persons who, according to tradition and customs, were in favor of being the close associate and friend of the accused. Was deposed. The FI rupees and trial court verdict had convicted the accused in the drug trafficking business. The convicted suspect was sentenced to seven years. The evidence had earlier proved to be a common man and a cleaner who had no solid source of income and did not inherit any property from his father who was a driver, furthermore, the accused did not knowingly appear in the witness box. So that the air can escape. Under the Prosecution Prosecution Property, the property was deemed to have been sufficiently obtained by the accused through his income, on the appeal of the accused, the drug trafficking was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer
