Find a Lawyer

KHALID AZIZ versus THE STATE

National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 26 Tenders who reviewed the case for an apology or inquiry during the investigation were badly affected by the order of the Accountability Court and declared the amnesty granted by the Chairman NAB to the accused / sanctioned as illegal. The above order was confirmed while praying for the giving. And without legal authority, the applicants believed that under Article 26 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999, the Chairman NAB could exercise its tender waiver options only when the matter was in the process of investigation or inquiry and that Reference was submitted. In the accountability court, the chairman became a reference to the applicant's accuracy and the co-accused was tiled by the chairman, NAB on 30 12 2000, the co-accused requested the NAB authority to approve it on 8 1 2001 and he was granted pardon. Statement of Co-accused by Chairman NAB under Section 164 on 24 2 2001, CCP Retrieved 20 3 2001 The charge against the accused appointed by the Judicial Magistrate was set on 16 1 2002, in which the participant The statement of the sixteen prosecution witnesses, including the chief of the accused, was completed on 21 6 2002 when the petition was transferred by the counsel of the applicants on the same day. Approval of Applicants Approval by Co-accused, Exemption by Chairman NAB for approval and Co-accused's statement under Section 164, CCP read with Section 26 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, and all such copies Should have been made part of the reference and under Section 265C, CCPC, applicants should also be provided at least seven days before the charges are made, when you need a advocate from Dir lawyer