Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR HAYAT KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Applicants to Section 2 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 24A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 4, 9, 15, 25 and 199 National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 9 Constitutional Appeals Keeping control of the Exit was not disclosed for any reason on the list of members of a political leader's family who were constitutional of the applicants listed in Articles 2A, 4, 9, 15 and 25 of the Constitution. The guaranteed rights were taken solely to take such action. Because his family head was subjected to references in the accountable courts, nothing was brought on the record to show that the applicants were directly involved in politics, corruption, filtration and hiding illicit politics. It was neither a sin nor a crime to participate, but it was important that the independence of the applicants who established the democratic system in the country could not be stopped simply because they were recorded as property owners. There is no criminal liability. Despite being thirteen (13) months into the issuance of an unidentified order, no action was taken against the applicants' property in their name under the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999. One of the applicants was a domestic wife who was ill. I was suffering Applicants did not need to have any criminal liability personally. The properties contained in the applicants \\ name, if the property of their family head is found to be illegal, may be processed in accordance with the provisions of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999 or may be prosecuted under other law ? Authorized jurisdiction property advocate from Kamalia lawyer