Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SYED CHIRAGH HUSSAIN versus BEGUM MUHAMMAD USMAN KHAN


Under Section 10, Chitral v Swat (Administration) Regulation (1969), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 The constitutional plea regarding property ownership did not agree with the High Court's affirmative remand order. There was no judicial treatment of any of the relevant ratings under Ridge or Germany, after which the High Court gave clear instructions for the decision of the case in a judicial manner that the Deputy Commissioner disregarded the High Court's instructions. The matter was seized. The pro and custom and the Deputy Commissioner being a controlling authority to decide the matter on its own cannot decide the law itself or refer to the forums provided under the law or the reg. More than one jurisdiction Any validity of law and jurisprudence justifies the session in accordance with the law within the time specified

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Besham lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.