Find a Lawyer

MAJOR (R) NADIR ALI versus THE STATE

The National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999, 19/11/12, did not prove the allegation of testimony that it failed to bring any material to the prosecution's record without accounting for property acquired during its services. Was, to show that the property was under investigation had been registered by the accused through corruption but the case against the accused remained under investigation for a very long time, yet nothing came on record. Was ever involved in any corruption or corruption process. Having obtained a loan for the purchase of land which was not disputed, Syed later sold the accused at small plots at high rates and his explanation in this regard seems satisfactory that the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. Done. registration advocate from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer