MAULANA AMIR ZAMAN BUKHARI versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Conducting Sections 27 and 52 General Elections [Chief Executive Order No. 7 of 2002], Article 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court Jurisdiction Election Commission Against Two Polling Stations Applicant's directive was based on the Report of the Returning Officer, in view of the acute irregularities; the statements of the candidates and the presiding officers of the constituency regarding the polling stations listed during the election process and the report submitted to the Election Commission was the applicant's position. That 14 polling stations have been rigged and re-polling should be ordered ??? According to the notification issued by the Election Commission of Pakistan by the Election Commission of Pakistan, issuing orders regarding the approval of the 14 polling stations and not 2 o'clock, the Commission, Election Commission and inquiry report shows that allegations of fraud at any stage. No content found to support. And at the 14 polling stations, the Commission had submitted complete anomalies, which was also recorded by the Inquiry Officer and not submitted to any inquiry officer, in which it was shown that Indicates content creation intent. In the absence of any evidence or supporting material produced by them, the Erie Officer had no justification that the fraud had been committed at 14 polling stations; the Petitioner, in those circumstances, filed an Election Petition under Section 52 of the Representation Act 1976 By filing a complaint. Report submitted by Member, Election Commission of Pakistan and Provincial Election Commissioner Inquiry Officer and Government approved by Member
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Patoki lawyer