MUHAMMAD ASLAM BHOTANI versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL
Conducting Sections 99 (1A) (K) and 14 (5A) General Elections Order [7 of Chief Executive Order No. 2002], Article 8D (2) (K) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application The nomination papers of the candidate objected to the inability to contest the election within the meaning of Article 8D (2) (k) of the General Election Order, 2002, which is represented by Section 99 (1A) of the Representation. (K) is read with. Candidate's resignation from the Civil Service on the eligibility of the People's Act, 1976 and the disqualification of the candidate, rejecting the first notification on the matter from May 7, 1999, accepting the election tribunal's powers by scrutinizing such subsequent notification. was done. The Election Tribunal was not given the jurisdiction to examine the validity, legality, justification or wiring of an order approved by a competent authority, or by such authority a notification issued by me in exercise of the Election Tribunal Had no jurisdiction to review the wires of the subsequent notification, nor could the Tribunal determine that the law was issued without any legal authority and had no legal effect. , The election tribunal was entrusted with limited specific jurisdiction to decide In the light of a notification issued by a competent authority, the Tribunal cannot revoke such notification as the nomination is valid or invalid and the reasons, grounds or grounds for exercising the powers in the competent authority under the relevant can be ascertained. Is. Terms of service followed by your own responsibilities and foundations
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Dandot lawyer