Find a Lawyer

WATAN PARTY versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE/PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN

The Chief Executive Order 24, Legal Framework Order 2002 Articles 3 and Schedule to the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution relating to the constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 184 (3) and 239 controversial applicants, Amendments made by the Schedule to Legal Framework Order 2002 in the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) were set aside on the basis of being illegal and unconstitutional and that the legal framework order 2002 was made by the Supreme Court decision in Syed. Was violated. Holding Zafar Ali Shah PLD 2000 SC 869 Accuracy In the case of Syed Zafar Ali Shah, the Supreme Court affirmed the PLD 2000 SC 869 additional constitutional action on the Touchstone of State requirement and the principle of Sales Populi East Supremacy came. It was concluded that the additional constitutional treasury had sufficiently integrated and credentialing materials to justify the intervention of the Armed Forces by the Supreme Court, while confirming that the additional constitutional action declared that the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), of the land. The law is left as a law, subject to the condition that certain parts of the State are required by the State and General of Pervez Musharraf, Chief Army was ignored by the staff. The Chairman, the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, described as the Chief Executive, was entitled to carry out all such actions and to carry out all legislative measures, such as all proceedings and legislative measures. May or may not be under the constitution of Pakistan (1973). It also includes the power to edit. However, the ban was imposed on the authority to amend the constitution so that it could be resorted to when the constitution declared by the chief executive. tax advocates from Doltala lawyer