Find a Lawyer

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PROVINCIAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT ATTOCK versus KHALID MEHMOOD

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Contract for the construction of the building The defendant withheld the security deposit submitted by the plaintiff, the work was not requested ? The tailoring suit challenges the plaintiff's terms and conditions of the contract, and a Certificate of Completion of Evidence is presented. The trial court denied the appellate court's completion certificate, In the review petition filed by the order, the order was set aside by the High Court. Such a document clearly relied on the certificate of completeness of the trial court's record on record, showing that the work was carried out within the stipulated time under the terms of the agreement and that the plaintiff was entitled to Withdraw the security deposit you have made. In the vague terms stated on the oath that the Certificate of Completion was issued by the Executive Engineer Appellate Court, upon reviewing the Completion Certificate, found that it was a false document which the defendants had no objection to at the time of its formation. Was raised and neither questioned the validity of the completion certificate nor did the victim of the wrong reading or proof of the evidence did not face the verdict wrong or the wrong structure of the facts and the Supreme Court of Appeal in the circumstances. Holiday request dismissed property advocates from Ziarat lawyer