Find a Lawyer

DR. NAVEEDA TUFAIL AND 72 OTHERS versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Applicants were appointed by the provincial government on an ad hoc basis to regulate the principle of equality, Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 2 (r) (a) and 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 25 ad hoc appointment. For several years, the provincial government refused to regulate applicant positions, and while similar appointments have been made regular by the federal government, applicants believe that the regular ban on positions violates the principles of inequality. As contained in Article 25 of the Constitution. The provincial government cannot claim to be regular in the light of federal government policy, but according to the principle of equality contained in Article 25 of the Constitution, it will demand that applicants be treated the same while equality The principle would be. The tuitioners should be clearly attracted in favor of PE as they were ad hoc lecturers in the provincial government as ad hoc employees of the federal government and it would be fair, reasonable and appropriate to consider the applicant's issues regularly. It has created legitimate expectations. In the minds of applicants for certification on a regular basis, the Supreme Court directed the provincial government, while seeking guidance from the federal government's ad hoc regulatory scheme, regulating applicants by the Provincial Public Service Commission Supreme. Start with the court. It is further directed that if no applicant has been found fit by the Public Service Commission, it will not be retained in the service. ask a advocate free from Manga Mandi lawyer