Find a Lawyer

SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 presented in court under the Articles 204 and 188 Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OS XXVI and XXVII Office of Judges (Judges) Order (10 of 1999), Article 3 Contract of Court Review Petition Application Bar Gone. The applicant made a reference to a resolution on behalf of the Supreme Court Bar Association and the Pakistan Bar Council claiming to be a representative body of lawyers, which also claimed that the applicant was ?heartily? The review refuses to discuss the contents of the application. The court, using unfounded remarks about the judiciary, made the request that could not be expected from the president's pen; the Supreme Court Bar Association insulted the Supreme Court and, on behalf of the bar's members, Attempts were made. Even for illicit use of the holy electorate, the Supreme Court observed that some members of the bar would make ill-informed statements on illicit, external considerations or for political reasons, or to corrupt the image of the judiciary, It was not in the national interest at all, reserving the right to take appropriate action and to take appropriate action against the plaintiff (applicant), the Supreme Court condemned and condemned the behavior of the petitioner (President Supreme Court Bar Association) and Declaring the contents of the application as ridiculous, malicious, and irrelevant, the paragraph was ordered (i) and (ii) to be removed, from which the Supreme Court gave further remarks that the administration of the system was particularly respected by the Bar and especially by the mutual cooperation between both the judiciary and the members of the bar. These members best advocate from Village Sunder lawyer