Find a Lawyer

SYEDA TAHIRA BEGUM versus SYED AKRAM ALI

The objection to the execution of Section 47 and OI, R 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), was adopted in favor of the plaintiff and the petition for execution was filed. The debtor was represented by her husband as a general counsel husband. On the execution request, the judgment debtor filed an objection on the ground that the possession of the property of the suit was not the responsibility of the judgment, but rather it was with him and was not enforced by the plaintiff as a party. Was. By the holders of the rulers until 13 12 1972, and more than three decades have passed, but the decree holders are in court to settle their grievance if the deciding husband's wife's lawyer As he was presenting, he had a complaint, that while he was defending the case, he could take regular action, from which the current execution request dismissed Supreme C. ust did not allow the husband of the decision-maker through technical objections that the High Court succeeded in obstructing the way of justice through technical objections to frustrating any decree obtained by the rulers. The High Court failed to identify any legal weakness in the decision to warrant interference, divorce advocates from Garh More lawyer