Find a Lawyer

NOOR ZAMAN versus THE MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE

Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act 1912 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Increase Food Scheme The land allotment was canceled in 1962 under such scheme made in favor of the respondents. ? Notification Dated 26 4 1971 Instead of restoring such an allottee collector, the applicant filed the petitioner by decision of the Board of Revenue in the year 1972, instead of restoring the land allotted under the provisional scheme in 1972. The review request was approved. Their lease extended again to Rabi in favor of the applicant, the collector put aside such an extension order and the respondents' claim was submitted under the Motion Food Scheme, such order of the Collector. Based on the report of the Audit Officer, the petitioner was retained in the High Court. Is it that the respondent did not bring about fifty percent of the area under cultivation, was not eligible for the restoration before the legal status of the allotment was unilateral such that the initial allotment in favor of the applicant disappeared of such notification Because of this, such a dispute of hers was of no use to her when the applicant was not in the picture, when such notification was issued that the petitioner did not challenge the decision. The date of the Board of Revenue was 5 5 197 1975, but it was accepted by the same respondent that its error was not successfully excluded from the possession of the petitioner because for all such period the High Court The orders of the Revenue Authority administered were unimaginable and could not be intercepted. Any ground spray law websites from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer