Find a Lawyer

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION versus YASIR ARAFAT

Constitutional Jurisdiction of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (2) and 1993 High Court on the basis of the results of the candidates by the Controller of Appeals, Appellate Authority and the Review Committee, using unfair means in fact-finding exams. ? In the examinations with constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court set aside the findings of fact through the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Convention of Authorities, using unfair means to provide continuity / extra sheets and materials as well as candidates. Positive feedback available on the record was also made on the basis of the answer sheets that the candidate had succeeded in obtaining favorable results by adopting unfair sources; therefore, in view of such facts, the High Court had jurisdiction. In the legal orders approved by the authority There was no jurisdiction to enter. Instead of the Article 199 Lucky Candidates, the High Court NGA illegally records the conduct of the candidates, who have demanded equal jurisdiction to maintain the errors they have committed. Orders against the board were held that the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education was responsible for illegal activities. If the results of the candidates are read with the results submitted by the Review Committee, no other conclusions can be drawn except that the candidates used not only unfair means to draw conclusions but all the articles. I used to get an equal number, therefore, the Supreme Court granted the board authorities privileges jobs for fresh advocates from Khair Pur lawyer