Find a Lawyer

ZAHEER UL ISLAM ABBASI versus UMAR AYUB KHAN

Section 99 (1A) (h) (i) (J) of the Public Act 1976 [Representation for Public Representation (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXVI of 2002)], Pakistan Army Act (XXXIX of 1952), Sections 55 and 59 of the Code of Conduct ( XLV of 1860), Article 121 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution rejects the nomination of the applicant on the basis that the applicant was a convicted person. The Election Tribunal heard the petitioner's removal request requesting that he had not been disqualified. In order to contest the election on the basis of his conviction under section 59 of the Pakistan Army Act 1952, he was read with Section 121A of the Code of Conduct, 1860, as well as the position of senior officer in the Armed Forces, a moral advocate. Was not obligated to perform duties from. Not only his applicant, but also the then government applicant failed to perform his duties under the law, the charges against the applicant were proved and he was sentenced by the Field Court Marshal and the Chief of the This is confirmed by the source. Army staff were not determined by any competent court / authority that the order for dismissal of the applicant approved on the basis of his conviction was still in the field, therefore, section 99 (1A) (h). (I) (c) The crime of conspiracy under Section 121A of the Representative People Act, 1976, cannot be said in any way in good faith with the PPC imagination, of the Armed Forces. The duty of the applicant as a member was to protect the country. But instead he was convicted not only for fighting against Pakistan, but also by using force to overthrow the then elected government. family advocate from Chiniot lawyer