GHULAM JAFFAR KHAN versus GULSHARE
The Section 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 suit for specific performance of the contract sale, was executed by the plaintiff and his brother in 1950 in favor of the plaintiff, which was then a minor special The indemnity clause was used in the sale agreement that in the event of the majority's age the minor's brother refused to sell, the executor would deduct and damage the plaintiffs / shopkeepers from their own land. The minor brother of the Age Acquisition proceeded on behalf of his elder brother and brought a case for this purpose, Was in 1980 that had been set for its big brother, the three-year period prescribed under Article period through the sale of land section 113 in favor of the claimants. The Act, 1908, will go against the plaintiffs for the specific performance of the contract when the lawsuit filed by the brother of the extortionist was filed by the defendants after the expiry of the three-year term. The facts were dismissed by the courts at the same time as the dismissal, which was verified by the two courts so that no irregularity or illegality was encountered, which could not be interfered with by the High Court. Use of its Edit Jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer