MUHAMMAD AAMER ABBAS versus THE STATE
Sections 230 (b) (c) and 22 30 define testimony in the presence of the complainant who was the brother of the deceased and other witnesses who were also the friend of the complainant, their strange behavior and behavior at the scene of the incident. Attacked by the invaders, but they neither interrupted nor stopped the invaders, which helped to frustrate their attempt to injure the dead, which were eight in number. On the other hand, witnesses silently witnessed the incident as they had no connection with the deceased. Send information about the incident to the inmates of their home. The injuries to the person who died in the ER were not mentioned, and no witnesses have ever indicated who caused the injuries, and even the investigating officer found the injuries unstable. Eyewitnesses said many witnessed the incident again, but none of them were investigated or witnessed as the police partner made similar allegations. The accused was acquitted of the trial court, but the accused exercised his right of self-defense to the maximum extent and the defendant was consistently acquitted. This situation was attracted by behavior. The accused was convicted under section 2302 (b), PPC is not appropriate, it was changed under section 2302 (c), PPC and the accused was punished accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Laliah lawyer