Find a Lawyer

ABID HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Section 497 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance of Adultery (VII VI of 1979), Section 10 (3) / 11 bail, with the grant of FIR, showed that the case against the accused was invalid and not the adultery of the adulteress The contract was available on the record of the marriage contract with the accused and in support of which he was shown to be 18 years old. On the very next day of Nikah, the prosecution filed a complaint against the magistrate against his parents stating that She was young and mature. He and the accused were having a happy marital life, and they further stated that they had never been kidnapped or tortured, but when they returned to their parents after recovery. He took a different stand and in his statement under the CRPC, accusing the accused of adultery and saying that his fingerprints on the bride were obtained strictly, according to the prosecution. In view of the contradictory statements, there is no reasonable basis for accepting this allegation. The offense was committed under the Prohibition Clause of Section 497, the CC accused was behind bars for more than six months and if any of the accused was further detained, no motive could be served. Bail cannot be withheld as punishment otherwise the accused had to be given in the bailout phase, the accused was released on bail, under the circumstances. lawer from fb area from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer