Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE

Section 302 (6) / 148/149 praised the evidence, tried to reduce the suspects along with the four accomplices and after the trial, the four accomplices gave them the benefit of the doubt, but Sentenced and sentenced the defendant to delay. The FIR which was otherwise specified will not affect the merits of the matter. The eyewitness had substantially confirmed the ocular account, as the complainant, who was also an eyewitness to the case, said that although the witnesses were related to each other as well as the accused, this would not be the only fact. It is enough to discredit his ocular account, otherwise it would have been proved on the record by medical and other evidence, the nature of the wounds and the wounds found in the body of the ocular account given by two eye witnesses. The recovery was not detected and the four accomplices have been acquitted. And none of the accompanying defendants had the effect of recovering the carbine; according to the evidence from the eye, medical and recovery recovery, the prosecutor was able to prove his case against the suspects without any doubt, medical evidence. The Ocular Account against the accused was fully authenticated, confirming the nature of the seating and injuries which resulted in the death of the alleged weapon used in the incident. One shot was specifically described as a pistol carbine which was recovered on the tip of one of the reports of the Franzik Science Laboratory's severely rescued, and the prosecution's version was also confirmed. list of supreme court advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer