FEROZ KHAIL versus SALIM AKBAR AFRIDI, ADVOCATE
Sections ???, & & ?, & 45 and Adv 51 Advocate's Complaint against the Advocate's Parsimonious Prosecution, At the outset of the proceedings against the Advocate, the solicitor submitted and denied all the above allegations on the complaint. Submitted his written statement, after which the Advocate was absent, the Member Disciplinary Committee recorded the earlier evidence and, on the basis of the data available on the record, sent to the Tribunal to finalize the case. An application was made to keep the cross-proceedings pending, which was not concluded. A final order could have appeared in the Advocate's previous action and could have been postponed to the adjournment date. The Advocate's conduct did not go beyond the Board as he always adopted a vague attitude in the process, and at one point, it would have incurred costs. But because the law insisted on the decision. On the merits, the principle that no one should be condemned should be avoided for violating the courtyard. The application for separation of the earlier proceedings filed by the Advocate was accepted and the earlier proceedings initiated by the Dispensary Committee were subject to payment of costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer