Find a Lawyer

GHARIB ULLAH versus THE STATE

Section 9 Definition of Evidence. The official who examined this material was in charge of the forensic science laboratory and the specimen taken from the long-recovered material was sealed regularly and not on record during cross-examination of witnesses or even in defense. Was brought. The sample was either tampered with or it was not the one that was sealed and sent to the examiner by the Chemical Examiner delay in the delivery of the prohibited articles because it was too short and none of that There was no evidence that he had been charged alternatively. The nature of the article was challenged not to become heroin, while there may have been some technical errors or misconduct during the investigation, but they were not enough to acquit the prosecution of the accused themselves, in which case they were beyond any doubt the suspect. Were able to prove their case against. One kilogram of quantity was recovered from the accused and was punished under Section 9 (b). The Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 was seven years, and according to Provo, if the section exceeds 10 kilograms, it cannot be less than life imprisonment, such provisions of law indicate that in the case of small quantities I would say, at least on this scale the measure would be sufficient, the sentence of four years imprisonment was deemed appropriate to meet the extremes of justice, according to which the sentence was changed, The accused was not involved or convicted in the cases. family advocate from Khair Pur lawyer