MST. SAFINA BIBI versus MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ
Sec & 67 & L 67 Determining the applicant's request for the issuance of an order for the management of the property / property of the allegedly insane applicant wife as well as her two children for the management of the plaintiff's property / property Appealing to issue an order, her husband alleged that she was unable to handle her property as a person with an inadequate mind. The court interviewed the defendant and asked her some questions on which she understood. Gave independent and appropriate answers. After examining the respondent, the court also sent the plaintiff to the hospital and the medical superintendent. There was no indication that the defendant was a lunatic, after inspecting the medical superintendent and listening to the parties, that the applicants' request for responsive observations was dismissed when the decision itself was reached. It was enough to stop the action. Respondent was not a crazy person The court was not open to any concession, considering expert opinion
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Timergara lawyer
