Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 940 41/9209/202020/88 Pre / 1 Act1 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947 of II), section (()) evidence to be appreciated; reduction of prosecution by seventeen witnesses Who was in the picture from the very beginning even if there was fraud. It was played by a bad accused, it was only the accused who was accused of being an illiterate himself, he affected all the documents presented in the trial on the thumb and his thumb. The mark was found to be consistent with the impression of his thumb, but cheating in association with the accused accused of the charge was successfully established by his own admission. The accused, who was found guilty, pleaded guilty to receiving a profit of Rs 24,000, demanded a reduction in his sentence, during which he was detained for some time. After the interrogation and the order of his sentence, the punishment was going on, the sentence already being pronounced by the accused was sufficient for his correction; the punishment of the accused was kept, accordingly his sentence was reduced. online advocate from Ugoki lawyer