Find a Lawyer

ASGHAR KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2 evidence2 was accused of defining evidence immediately in the listed FIR, hearing of the incident was routine and witnesses had no previous hostility to falsely implicate the accused. The witnesses were natural witnesses to the incident, and the recovery of their evidence provides evidence. On the occasion of the report of the suspect of the Franz Science Laboratory, the gun was in positive prosecution, failing to bring any documents on record to accept the trial because it was unclear what the land was in dispute. Was. At the time of the incident, the accused was a juvenile between the victim and the accused, and he fired only one, which did not maintain the conviction of the same High Court but changed the sentence from death to life imprisonment. Was maintained under paid conditions best law firms from Bat Khela lawyer