MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392/411 bail, grant of further inquiry was behind bars for the last nine months but despite being on physical remand for 14 days with police delay, the accused No recovery has been done. The 22-day filing of the FIR did not specify that the recovery of the alleged loot amount was taken from three other persons who had previously been involved in such cases, but the accused was liable for any such cases or any. There was no reputation for involvement in criminal activity. The accused had earlier applied for the culprit's registration against the complainant, a case against which it was regularly claimed as entertaining, the possibility of being involved by the complainant through Counter Blast, the matter was lighted The bit cannot be ignored after which it needs further investigation. Bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Jamrud Road lawyer
