Find a Lawyer

FARYAD MASIH ALIAS PHAJU versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324 / 337A (i) / 337A (ii) / 337F (i) / 337F (ii) / 427/148/149 guarantees, further investigation. According to the K-Grant FIR, the suspect was empty-handed during the incident, but during the interrogation, the prosecutor's witness stated that the accused had hit him on the head with a brick, and that the accused had not suffered any injuries. No one was named in the FIR for any specific injuries. The accused was initially not present on the spot when the victim suffered injuries through a co-accused and after the main incident was already in the state, the accused came to the spot and at the same time, the police officer confirmed the fact. During the three investigations in the case, the accused was found innocent and no recovery had been effected from the accused nor was the investigation of the accused already finalized, the continued custody of the accused in the jail Purpose was not likely to be fulfilled The question of sharing of the common people with the accused participant along with the object of the accused The question regarding his fiduciary liability for a crime caused by Lism is also against the accused in the trial court's trial under Section 7497 (?), CR, seeking further investigation of his crime. Will be done PC, he was out on bail top advocate from Tall lawyer